RAG, without the magic

AN EIGHT-PART FIELD GUIDE
A non-technical path from deciding whether retrieval belongs in the system to measuring which half failed.
Start with part one ↗Reading order / 8 parts
Eight progressively connected essays on retrieval-augmented generation: the decision, the pipeline, document boundaries, semantic representations, relevance, query intent, architecture, and evaluation.
- 0110 MIN read
Should this be RAG?
Decide whether the missing piece is knowledge, behavior, or both.
3 figures ↗ - 0215 MIN read
What happens before the answer?
One loop prepares the library. Another finds the evidence.
5 figures ↗ - 0315 MIN read
The boundary becomes part of the answer
Choose what stays together before retrieval decides what matters.
5 figures ↗ - 049 MIN read
How does a search find the same idea in different words?
Embeddings estimate relatedness. Indexes retrieve candidates.
5 figures ↗ - 0510 MIN read
Similar is not relevant
Related passages are candidates. The answer still has to earn its place.
4 figures ↗ - 0611 MIN read
The retriever got the wrong question
Clarify, rewrite, split, or chain before retrieval.
6 figures ↗ - 0712 MIN read
The pipeline is part of the answer
Start fixed. Branch only when failure is measured.
6 figures ↗ - 0817 MIN read
The answer failed. Which half broke?
Evaluate both stages. Keep the trace.
6 figures ↗